Proper maintenance and care of multi-threading locks
The following strategies are used to ensure that the code is dead-lock free (generally by addressing the 4th Coffman condition: circular wait).
- structure code such that only one lock will need to be acquired at a time
- always acquire shared locks in the same order, as given by the table below
- avoid constructs that expect to need unrestricted recursion
Locks
Below are all of the locks that exist in the system and the mechanisms for using them that avoid the potential for deadlocks (no Ostrich algorithm allowed here):
The following are definitely leaf locks (level 1), and must not try to acquire any other lock:
safepoint
Note that this lock is acquired implicitly by
JL_LOCK
andJL_UNLOCK
. use the_NOGC
variants to avoid that for level 1 locks.While holding this lock, the code must not do any allocation or hit any safepoints. Note that there are safepoints when doing allocation, enabling / disabling GC, entering / restoring exception frames, and taking / releasing locks.
shared_map
finalizers
pagealloc
gcpermlock
flisp
jlinstackwalk (Win32)
ResourcePool<?>::mutex
RLST_mutex
llvmprintingmutex
jllockedstream::mutex
debuginfo_asyncsafe
inferencetimingmutex
ExecutionEngine::SessionLock
flisp itself is already threadsafe, this lock only protects the
jl_ast_context_list_t
pool likewise, the ResourcePool<?>::mutexes just protect the associated resource pool
The following is a leaf lock (level 2), and only acquires level 1 locks (safepoint) internally:
- globalrootslock
- Module->lock
- JLDebuginfoPlugin::PluginMutex
- newlyinferredmutex
The following is a level 3 lock, which can only acquire level 1 or level 2 locks internally:
- Method->writelock
- typecache
The following is a level 4 lock, which can only recurse to acquire level 1, 2, or 3 locks:
- MethodTable->writelock
No Julia code may be called while holding a lock above this point.
orc::ThreadSafeContext (TSCtx) locks occupy a special spot in the locking hierarchy. They are used to protect LLVM's global non-threadsafe state, but there may be an arbitrary number of them. By default, all of these locks may be treated as level 5 locks for the purposes of comparing with the rest of the hierarchy. Acquiring a TSCtx should only be done from the JIT's pool of TSCtx's, and all locks on that TSCtx should be released prior to returning it to the pool. If multiple TSCtx locks must be acquired at the same time (due to recursive compilation), then locks should be acquired in the order that the TSCtxs were borrowed from the pool.
The following is a level 5 lock
- JuliaOJIT::EmissionMutex
The following are a level 6 lock, which can only recurse to acquire locks at lower levels:
- codegen
- jlmodulesmutex
The following is an almost root lock (level end-1), meaning only the root look may be held when trying to acquire it:
typeinf
this one is perhaps one of the most tricky ones, since type-inference can be invoked from many points
currently the lock is merged with the codegen lock, since they call each other recursively
The following lock synchronizes IO operation. Be aware that doing any I/O (for example, printing warning messages or debug information) while holding any other lock listed above may result in pernicious and hard-to-find deadlocks. BE VERY CAREFUL!
iolock
Individual ThreadSynchronizers locks
this may continue to be held after releasing the iolock, or acquired without it, but be very careful to never attempt to acquire the iolock while holding it
Libdl.LazyLibrary lock
The following is the root lock, meaning no other lock shall be held when trying to acquire it:
toplevel
this should be held while attempting a top-level action (such as making a new type or defining a new method): trying to obtain this lock inside a staged function will cause a deadlock condition!
additionally, it's unclear if any code can safely run in parallel with an arbitrary toplevel expression, so it may require all threads to get to a safepoint first
Broken Locks
The following locks are broken:
toplevel
doesn't exist right now
fix: create it
Module->lock
This is vulnerable to deadlocks since it can't be certain it is acquired in sequence. Some operations (such as
import_module
) are missing a lock.fix: replace with
jl_modules_mutex
?loading.jl:
require
andregister_root_module
This file potentially has numerous problems.
fix: needs locks
Shared Global Data Structures
These data structures each need locks due to being shared mutable global state. It is the inverse list for the above lock priority list. This list does not include level 1 leaf resources due to their simplicity.
MethodTable modifications (def, cache) : MethodTable->writelock
Type declarations : toplevel lock
Type application : typecache lock
Global variable tables : Module->lock
Module serializer : toplevel lock
JIT & type-inference : codegen lock
MethodInstance/CodeInstance updates : Method->writelock, codegen lock
- These are set at construction and immutable:
- specTypes
- sparam_vals
- def
- owner
- These are set by
jl_type_infer
(while holding codegen lock):
- cache
- rettype
- inferred
* valid ages
inInference
flag:
- optimization to quickly avoid recurring into
jl_type_infer
while it is already running- actual state (of setting
inferred
, thenfptr
) is protected by codegen lock
Function pointers:
- these transition once, from
NULL
to a value, while the codegen lock is heldCode-generator cache (the contents of
functionObjectsDecls
):
- these can transition multiple times, but only while the codegen lock is held
- it is valid to use old version of this, or block for new versions of this, so races are benign, as long as the code is careful not to reference other data in the method instance (such as
rettype
) and assume it is coordinated, unless also holding the codegen lock
LLVMContext : codegen lock
Method : Method->writelock
- roots array (serializer and codegen)
- invoke / specializations / tfunc modifications